A Fragile Balance
There was once a time when the structure of our government—three coequal branches—felt like an unshakable truth. It was taught to us in school, simplified into tidy diagrams and textbooks: executive, legislative, judicial. Each with its powers. Each with its limits. Together, a system of checks and balances, designed to keep any one force from overtaking the others.
But lately, that balance feels more like a memory than a reality.
I’m not here to point fingers or name parties. This isn’t about political allegiance. It’s about the slow unraveling of something we should all hold sacred: accountability, restraint, and the idea that no person—or institution—is above the Constitution.
What worries me is not just the actions of those in power, but the apathy of those watching from the sidelines. We scroll, we sigh, we shrug. We treat erosion like entertainment. We accept dysfunction as inevitable. But at what cost?
When one branch asserts dominance without consequence, when the judiciary becomes politicized, when the legislative body is reduced to tribalism and performative noise—what is left of the republic we claim to uphold?
I worry that we've become numb to the gravity of what's happening. That the storm is still gathering, and we’ve convinced ourselves the weather is fine.
We don't have to agree on every issue to agree that democracy demands care. It’s not self-sustaining. It requires effort, vigilance, and above all, humility. The kind that reminds us we are all—citizens and leaders alike—responsible for this fragile experiment.
We need fewer slogans and more listening. Less winning, more wisdom. Less noise, more accountability.
This isn't about left or right. It's about whether the foundation is still holding. And if it's not, then we owe it to each other to fix it—not for power, not for legacy, but for the possibility of something better than this.
We are not helpless. But we must choose to be engaged.
And that starts by staying curious, not judgmental. Even now.
Especially now.